FG Falcon XT
 

Home
PICS DOWN UNDER
Canon vs Fuji
Navigation
MAP of OZ
FG Falcon XT


So how is the new  FG Falcon?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

Just want know about grunt? ....Then look at this

Otherwise read on to see what we thought.....

 First impressions

A first look revealed a sleeker, smoother and more refined vehicle than the previous BF MK2, and with the foot down it really wanted to go too.  The steering response is very even, and gives a very predictable drive.  The car doesn't feel as large as it is once you get moving and it handles itself well.   

Although the styling is sleek, I’m sure Ford could have done more to differentiate it from the BF.  Look at an FG in your rear view mirror it could easily be mistaken for the previous model.  Not that that’s bad, I like the new styling but just wish it was more different.  Having said that, the higher series models do grab your attention better than the base versions.

For those who don't know, the vehicle tested is a bottom of the line, base model XT Falcon.  From there you can choose from either luxury sports models - the G's, or go for the sportier XR models.

Interior and comfort

Compared to the outgoing model, and the equivalent VE commodore, the interior is a  step up, and gives a warmer, more up market feel.   It's much less plasticy, and gives higher quality impression.   The powertrain and road noise are also improved on the old model.  Stepping between a VE commodore and FG falcon is chalk and cheese when it comes to engine noise, the Falcon sounds smooth and leaves the harshness of the commodore in the dark ages as you plow through the rev range.  The steering wheel feels great in the hands, you quickly notice it’s wider profile than previous model which adds much more than you might think to the whole driving experience. 

The front seats 'fitted well', and remained comfortable after quite a few hours of driving.  They are easily adjustable and I had no trouble with finding the right position, but then I shouldn’t since I am pretty much average height and weight.  So you’ll just have to test them out for yourself.  The rear seats angle back more than the flat bottomed previous model which gives a much more natural position.  The lack here compared to the VE the rear leg room.  Having a tall front passenger or driver leaves less rear leg room than the Holden. 

Layout

The new console and dash layout is also much better than before, and arguably nicer than the competition.  It could be said that dials are easier than buttons as found on the FG, but they are quickly learned you can’t beat the looks.  The positioning is logical and easy to find.  Surprisingly the base model even comes with climate control, which can be easily used in 'semi auto' if you don’t like the settings.  On high power the vent noise was more intrusive than expected though, compared to the overall good refinement.   

The center console display screen is easy to read and well layed out.  Nothing fancy here, but it's quite large, and displays all you need to know about the entertainment mode and hot-cold settings; and even some things that don’t need knowing so much, like the outside temperature.  The large buttons below make station swapping very easy and add an extra level of control.  A fancier colour screen comes with the upper spec models. 

A handy new feature for the FG is the instrument cluster display found in between the speedo and tacho.  It can be set to display among other things, anything from your fuel used in liters, to your current speed, your cruise control speed setting, or even the radio station.  Holden has had a similar display for a while, but it's not quite as functional as the new Falcon's. 

The handbrake is positioned well, and feels comfortable to use, it's not difficult here to beat the Commodore with it's square shaped un-ergonomic version that does look great, but looses it’s charm once you use it.  The shifter uses the same formula as proven successful in the BA/BF, with its manual/performance mode accessed by a flick to the left.  

Like all modern cars there is a cup holder in the center console, designed to fit multiple cup sizes.  The rubber insert can even be removed to reveal a very deep cup holder or storage container if you want it.  Overall there are probably less useful hidey holes than the Holden or Toyota Aurion. 

The FG comes with a few handy ‘auto’ features you will notice that make life that bit more pleasant.  You’ll quickly notice the auto indicators that flash three times with a flick of the stalk.  The interior lighting that turns off as you leave the car, rather than when you turn the ignition off.  The auto door lock that locks as you drive off makes you feel kind of secure, although I’m not sure it will come in handy unless you’re traveling the back streets of Africa.  The wipers even do an extra flip after you wash the windscreen to catch those last drips.  The auto headlights are good too, but that’s been around for a while now.    

Country roads

The Falcon feels very confident on windy roads, and soaks up the bumps well.  The damping is much improved, which is noticeable even the first time you step on brakes.  On cornering it sits quite flat and is easily kept under control, in case you loose it, Dynamic stability control as standard should come in handy, as could the front and side air bags.  In years gone by these safety features were only ever options on base models.   

 

 
 
 
 
 

Performance

So we get to performance…..Can the FG take on the VE for straight line performance?   Will the Holden ‘Go better’ as the commercials suggest…..Lets see....

 

 

 

 

0-60 (sec)

0-80 (sec)

0-100 (sec)

0-120 (sec)

0-160 (sec)

0-400m (sec)

0-400m (km/h)

VE Berlina

3.6 Litre V6

4 Speed Auto

3.7

5.3

8

10.9

21.1

15.7

144

FG Facon XT

4.0 Litre In-line 6

5 Speed Automatic

3.4

5

7.3

10.2

17.9

15.5

153


 

Comparing the base model FG Falcon to the VE Berlina on the track, shows just how much quicker the Falcon is.   

Not only is the Falcon faster at the low end from 0-60kph, but it’s quicker all the way through to 160kph, reaching 160kph a full 3 seconds faster.  The faster quarter mile time shows similar results.  This effective gearing and strong engine is quickly noticed on the road. 

The results become less surprising when you look at engine specifications, with the Falcon claiming 18% more torque and 8% more power and an extra gear.  The gap would close somewhat if the Berlina tested had the ‘high performance’ V6 found in the Calais, but you are starting to pay a lot more for the up spec package.  Considering you get this much power and torque in a base variant, its just like the icing on the cake.

Official figures

 

Transmission

Power (KW)

Torque (Nm)

Weight (kg)

Economy l/100km

FG Falcon XT

5spd auto

195

391

1740

10.5

VE Berlina

4 spd auto

180

330

1705

10.8

Speaking about engines, on test this FG's fuel economy clicked in at 8.9 L/100km on the highway/city leg, then jumped up to 12L/100km after getting a hammering. 

 Conclusion

Comparing these two base models at least, I would consider the Falcon a better overall package, with better console layout, more inviting interior in terms perceived quality at least, and with a measurable performance advantage.  Sure there are a few little niggles, but you quickly get over them in the drivers seat.  Considering the base models are what many people will choose simply due to the cash factor of higher spec models, you would have to seriously consider the new Falcon if you are looking for a new sedan.